Guardian, The (Spectrum)
.jpg)
Do you think prolife should be full spectrum for life?
Currently prolifers elect unborn above the born 143 million orphaned children (1), world peace (2), ending slavery (Walmart: the high cost of low prices), valuing family businesses and family farms. These same people who call themselves prolife elect in support of war killing 1 million men, women, and children in Iraq, not counting unborn (2). Prolifers shop in support of unpatriotic big business relocating US jobs to abroad child slavery sweatshops, where children work 16 hours a day 7 days a week for pennies(3). If pro-newborns is going to use the broad name prolife, they better look full spectrum to world peace, ending slavery, adopting Orphans, valuing small family business and family farming. Start valuing orphaned children and women as much as newborns.
Source: 1. Orphanshope.org, 2. (http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2170237,00.html),
3. Walmart: the high cost of low prices.
The pro-life movement is just one extreme. The other extreme is those who want a twelve year old girl to be able to obtain an abortion without parental consent, or at least judicial consent, or for a woman to be allowed to abort a full-term pregnancy, just because she "changed her mind."
Both sides are just so wrong on this issue. If we could just find some middle ground, together with reasonable views on birth control, there would be fewer abortions, but they'd be available when appropriate.
